In
2003, the Centers for Disease Control reported that 1 in 12 U.S. women
of childbearing age have unsafe levels of mercury in their bodies.How bad it it?
Forty-four states and territories have issued health advisories about
eating fish caught in local waters, and new research is raising red
flags about mercury in canned tuna, a staple of kid’s lunchboxes across
the country.
Reference: Dr. Roger Schlickeisen, President Defenders of Wildlife, Summer 2004 issue, p. 5
Mercury Contamination in Fish
As
of 2004, it is illegal for women in Greenland to breastfeed their
children due to high levels of chemical contaminants that accumulate
from their primary diet of fish. This is attributed to the jet-stream winds from America that are deposited into the Ocean around Greenland. From: - Los Angeles Times, Jan. 13, 2004, p. A1
Following are excerpts from: Science and Health, The Mercury Story, Jan 21, 2005 Published by Public Broadcasting System: http//www.pbs.org/now/science/mercuryinfish.html
In
America one-in-six children born every year have been exposed to
mercury levels so high that they are potentially at risk for learning
disabilities and motor skill impairment and short-term memory loss.
That type of mercury exposure is caused by eating certain kinds of
fish, which contain high levels of the toxin from both natural and
man-made sources such as emissions from coal-fired power plants.
One government analysis shows that 630,000 children each year are exposed to potentially unsafe mercury levels in the womb. If the government and its scientists know about the mercury problem, why do so many people continue to be poisoned?
Over
recent years NOW has examined how the influence of the tuna industry on
the FDA may be putting Americans and their children at risk for mercury
poisoning. Tuna, widely known for its health benefits, is one of the
most popular foods on grocery store shelves. And, in 2000, FDA draft
advisories presented to focus groups warned women not to eat a lot of
canned tuna during pregnancy because it contains levels of mercury that
can harm developing fetuses and nursing babies. In March 2004, the FDA
and the EPA issued the first ever joint advisory on this topic, What You Need to Know About Mercury in Fish and Shellfish .
Nearly
all fish contain trace amounts of methylmercury. How does this element
get into our fish supply? Mercury occurs both naturally and from
man-made sources. Some of it can be traced to coal-burning power
plants. Smokestacks release toxic mercury emissions which rain down
into rivers, lakes, and oceans. Bacteria convert the mercury to a form
that's easily absorbed by insects and other small organisms. Mercury
moves up the food chain as small fish eat the small organisms and big
fish eat the smaller fish. The highest concentrations accumulate in
large predators such as shark, swordfish and tuna...some of America's
favorite fish.
Pregnant women, nursing mothers, and very young children are cautioned against excessive consumption of these fish.
Step 1 - DETERMINE EPA's RECOMMENDED LEVEL FOR A 45 LB CHILD
Multiply child's body weight by EPA's reference dose.
Convert 45 pounds to kilograms = 20.45 kilograms
20.45 kilograms x .1 micrograms per kilogram per day
EPA RECOMMENDED LEVEL = 2.05 micrograms per day = 14.35 micrograms per week.
Step 2 - HOW MUCH MERCURY IS IN 6 OUNCES OF CHUNK WHITE TUNA?
Multiply amount of fish by average mercury level for chunk white albacore.
Convert 6 ounces to grams = 170 grams 170 grams X .31 ppm (or micrograms per gram)
MERCURY INGESTED = 52.7 micrograms per gram
Step 3 – COMPARE MERCURY INGESTED WITH EPA'S RECOMMENDED LEVEL
Divide 52.7 micrograms by 14.35 micrograms = 3.7
BY EATING 6 OUNCES OF CHUNK WHITE TUNA A WEEK, THE CHILD IS INGESTING ALMOST FOUR TIMES EPA'S RECOMMENDED DOSE.
In
December 2003, the FDA began circulating a draft advisory warning women
who are pregnant, nursing, or who might become pregnant about the
dangers of mercury in seafood. Critics like the Environmental Working
Group objected to the advisory's vague guidance on tuna, and
subsequently filed a legal challenge, charging that the advisory did
not meet standards for accurate government science established by the
Data Quality Act. In February 2004, a
new analysis by the Environmental Protection Agency revealed that
"about 630,000 children are born each year at risk for lowered
intelligence and learning problems caused by exposure to high levels of
mercury in the womb," nearly double the previous EPA estimate.
Given its popularity, canned tuna is the largest dietary source of mercury exposure in the United States.
The government based their most recent guidelines on tests of mostly
American brands of tuna, even though a growing proportion of the canned
tuna consumed today in the United States is imported. In 2004, for
example, 51 percent of the total U.S. supply of canned tuna came from
foreign sources. Defenders conducted this study to determine whether
all canned light and albacore tuna is similar in mercury content, as
the current federal guidelines suggest.
Disturbing Results
Our testing results revealed high levels of mercury in canned tuna, including light tuna, which the FDA has categorized as a “low-mercury
fish.” A significant proportion of light tuna we sampled contained
levels of mercury high enough to pose a potential public health risk,
particularly to children and developing fetuses. More than one-third
(35 percent) of all cans in our sample had mercury levels above 0.3
parts per million (ppm). Eating just
one six-ounce can of this tuna a week would cause a 140 pound woman—and
nearly all children— to exceed the EPA’s “reference dose” for mercury.
In fact, based on this study, a 45-pound child eating one can of light
tuna in a week would be consuming mercury at a level three times higher
than the EPA’s recommended maximum allowable dose of mercury.
From: The Mercury Policy Project Report issued by: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, www.defenders.org;
THE CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, www.cspinet.org